© 2015 – 2026 EIP
Legal • Impressum • Site by Igloo

© 2015 – 2026 EIP
Legal • Impressum • Site by Igloo

@oxfordleaders @OxfordWords The dictionary definitions in the link are the opposite of those in the tweet. Recto=front and verso=back.

Initial decision in HGSvLilly #SPC case. http://t.co/WWJ6OUXs If CoA holds HGS patent valid, we may get another #CJEU referral!

A recycled cardboard bike for $9 - just avoid the puddles! http://t.co/f10Z1Ym9

A recycled cardboard bike for $9 - just avoid the puddles! http://t.co/f10Z1Ym9

“@BBCTech: Why don't girls want to be geeks? http://t.co/N5BCQyQQ” - at @EIP they do!

After #AIPPI rapid response seminar on Neurim last night, considering how far teleological interpretation of SPC Regulation can go.

#AndreaBrewster in #CIPA Journal: In [Robin Jacob's] view bifurcation is simply not worth the four syllables it occupies #unitarypatent

Looking forward to the #AIPPI Seminar this evening on SPCs after the CJEU Neurim decision. Hope to see many SPC enthusiasts there.

"When a Latin word defies all attempts at explaining its origin, it is customary to resort to Etruscan." Quite. #OUP

Quick grant patents impress investors? http://t.co/NGglkzZO [Testimony showing UK Patent Office's Green Channel works for investment]

Quick grant patents impress investors? http://t.co/NGglkzZO [Testimony showing UK Patent Office's Green Channel works for investment]

Learning from HTC v Apple - what does it tell us about the patentability of computer programs? http://t.co/xsaT0qjX

I am also loving the Canadian concept of a "prothonotary" - a kind of judge

Amused reading that a ground of appeal to the Hoge Raad (Supreme Court, Netherlands) is "incomprehensible motivation" of Appeal Court

Everything you wanted to know about 2011 and the Boards of Appeal of the #EPO http://t.co/v3zP62qY. This is what I shall be reading tonight

Full text of Samsung v Apple decision on publication of non-infringement now available on #BAILII. http://t.co/eu7m74p2

@Ipkat "Appellant" is particularly hard to follow as it depends which side lost at first instance... And if you are at Supreme Court...

Enjoying @Ipkat post from @BallesterIP on collective trade mark for #Barcelona http://t.co/FApe2DyV. Wish I was there! But terrible pun.

More on Apple v Samsung by Darren Smyth @EIP_Elements in World Trademark Review Daily (subscription-only content) http://t.co/4qzZU8A5

Reading Neurim decision - CJEU allows SPC: http://t.co/gLlEwttZ. Teleological interpretation - law's intention more important than wording.

In Samsung v Apple registered design case Judge orders publication of non-infringement finding http://t.co/mmnuJfVF

@AmeriKitten @ManagingIP I agree with Annsley! @Ipkat should have been included in top 50. But happy that Judge Colin Birss is there.

More ghosting on the @Ipkat from me: http://t.co/dKLwNyag I promise I will take a rest now.

I'm attending London Cleantech Cluster Launch -- http://t.co/BjcQHfkN. Looking forward to seeing everyone there.

Sustainability problems galore but a lack of solutions http://t.co/b92ggD4y

Sustainability problems galore but a lack of solutions http://t.co/b92ggD4y

SCHENCK ROTEC v UNIVERSAL BALANCING just posted on BAILII http://t.co/JvDOU6fL. Innocent infringement defence under s62 accepted.

In this account of lawsuit about zombie blood, amused by "liquid (or liquidy thing)" http://t.co/pxErwWPe @DaltonTrans @DrRubidium

Guest post on @Ipkat - monster decision from Arnold J. http://t.co/EYf47aWU Post-published evidence of technical effect rarely admissible

@TomMitcheson @Ipkat Very robust attitude Mr Mitcheson. Your forensic approach has brightened my morning.

@Ipkat If there was a tweet symbol for sympathy, I would be using it now. Courage mon brave - only 7.5 hours to go.

@ksnhlaw Thanks for timely reporting of important news!

@ksnhlaw has written excellent post on latest round of chaos on #UnitaryPatent http://t.co/glCwgdkS Keep watching this space!

The 23-Year-Old USC engineering student who created the recycling icon http://t.co/tixuDtH1

The IPKat: A scoop from a spook? No, it's victory for Samsung over Apple http://t.co/n97pW60i [From 'special guest' @EIP_Elements]

My preliminary report of the Samsung v Apple decision has just been posted here http://t.co/hEsjGyFM. Thanks to the @Ipkat

Judge Birss (cheekily) concludes "They are not as cool."

HH Judge Birss QC finds "[t]he overall impression produced is different" - Galaxy Tablets distinguished on thinness and back details.

Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablets DO NOT INFRINGE Apple's Registered Community Design!

Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablets DO NOT INFRINGE Apple's Registered Community Design! Reading decision now.